Joel M. Hailey v. Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent of the Estate of James L. Corzine

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 7, 2014
Docket04-12-00823-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joel M. Hailey v. Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent of the Estate of James L. Corzine (Joel M. Hailey v. Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent of the Estate of James L. Corzine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joel M. Hailey v. Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent of the Estate of James L. Corzine, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-12-00823-CV

Joel M. HAILEY, Appellant

v.

Joseph PADUH III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, Deceased, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent Executor of the Estate of James L. Corzine, Deceased, Appellees

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012-PC-0856A Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED as to the portion of the summary judgment in favor of Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, Deceased, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent Executor of the Estate of James L. Corzine, Deceased, that declares the order approving the section 1162.001 trust, and the orders emanating directly from that order, null and void. The trial court’s judgment is REVERSED as to the portion of the summary judgment in favor of Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, Deceased, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent Executor of the Estate of James L. Corzine, Deceased, that declares the order appointing Hailey as guardian, and the orders emanating directly therefrom, null and void, and judgment is RENDERED in favor of Joel M. Hailey as to those orders.

We order that each party bear their own costs of this appeal, if any.

SIGNED May 7, 2014.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joel M. Hailey v. Joseph Paduh III, Temporary Administrator of the Estate of Joe Perry Corzine, and Stephen P. Takas Jr., Trustee of the Joe Perry Corzine Trust, and Successor Independent of the Estate of James L. Corzine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-m-hailey-v-joseph-paduh-iii-temporary-administrator-of-the-estate-texapp-2014.