Joel Jules v. The State of Florida
This text of Joel Jules v. The State of Florida (Joel Jules v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 10, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-0605 Lower Tribunal No. F07-913 ________________
Joel Jules, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariana Fajardo Orshan, Judge.
Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011)
(“Since ‘no evidentiary hearing is allowed’ under [Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure] 3.800(a), a claim of error that the petitioner can establish only by
relying on facts that are not evident on the face of the record is a claim that
cannot be adjudicated under that rule provision.” (quoting Brooks v. State,
969 So. 2d 238, 242 (Fla. 2007))); Martinez v. State, 298 So. 3d 1196, 1200
(Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (modification of a sentence after it has begun to be
served does not violate double jeopardy where the defendant agreed to the
modification).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joel Jules v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-jules-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.