Joel Jules v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 2024·No. 2023-0605·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 10, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23-0605

Lower Tribunal No. F07-913

Joel Jules,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ariana Fajardo Orshan, Judge.

Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Christina L. Dominguez, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and LOBREE and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045, 1050 (Fla. 2011)

(“Since ‘no evidentiary hearing is allowed’ under [Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure] 3.800(a), a claim of error that the petitioner can establish only by relying on facts that are not evident on the face of the record is a claim that cannot be adjudicated under that rule provision.” (quoting Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 242 (Fla. 2007))); Martinez v. State, 298 So. 3d 1196, 1200 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020) (modification of a sentence after it has begun to be served does not violate double jeopardy where the defendant agreed to the modification).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joel Jules v. The State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Joel Jules v. The State of Florida (Joel Jules v. The State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
969 So. 2d 238 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Johnson v. State
60 So. 3d 1045 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2011)