Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank

470 F.2d 994

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided November 15, 1972·No. 156·Published

Opinion

470 F.2d 994

Joel J. TARTELL, Appellant,
v.
CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 156, Docket 72-1665.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 15, 1972.
Decided Nov. 15, 1972.

Harold L. Young, New York City (Young, Sonnenfeld & Busner, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Jerome J. Londin, New York City (Carro, Spanbock & Londin, Kenneth A. Lapatine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler's opinion below. 351 F.Supp. 1071.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

470 F.2d 994

Joel J. TARTELL, Appellant,
v.
CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.

No. 156, Docket 72-1665.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Nov. 15, 1972.
Decided Nov. 15, 1972.

Harold L. Young, New York City (Young, Sonnenfeld & Busner, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Jerome J. Londin, New York City (Carro, Spanbock & Londin, Kenneth A. Lapatine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler's opinion below. 351 F.Supp. 1071.

Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank, 470 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1972).

Pincite

470 F.2d 994 (Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.