Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank
This text of 470 F.2d 994 (Joel J. Tartell v. Chelsea National Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
470 F.2d 994
Joel J. TARTELL, Appellant,
v.
CHELSEA NATIONAL BANK, Appellee.
No. 156, Docket 72-1665.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 15, 1972.
Decided Nov. 15, 1972.
Harold L. Young, New York City (Young, Sonnenfeld & Busner, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Jerome J. Londin, New York City (Carro, Spanbock & Londin, Kenneth A. Lapatine, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Tyler's opinion below. 351 F.Supp. 1071.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
470 F.2d 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-j-tartell-v-chelsea-national-bank-ca2-1972.