Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin

Fourth Circuit

Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin

402 F.2d 57

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedOctober 9, 1968

Docket12807

StatusPublished

This text of 402 F.2d 57 (Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin, 402 F.2d 57 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants’ army reserve units were ordered to active duty under Public Law 89-687, 80 Stat. 980. In Morse v. Boswell, 4th Cir., August 26, 1968, 401 F.2d 544, we denied relief to other reservists similarly situated. Additionally, we conclude that 10 U.S.C. § 673a did not by implication either repeal or render void Public Law 89-687.

*58 The appellees’ motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s order denying the issuance of writs of habeas corpus is granted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellants’ army reserve units were ordered to active duty under Public Law 89-687, 80 Stat. 980. In Morse v. Boswell, 4th Cir., August 26, 1968, 401 F.2d 544, we denied relief to other reservists similarly situated. Additionally, we conclude that 10 U.S.C. § 673a did not by implication either repeal or render void Public Law 89-687.

*58 The appellees’ motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s order denying the issuance of writs of habeas corpus is granted.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

402 F.2d 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-felberbaum-v-major-general-v-j-maclaughlin-ca4-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack