Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin

Fourth Circuit

Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin

402 F.2d 57

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 9, 1968·No. 12807·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The appellants’ army reserve units were ordered to active duty under Public Law 89-687, 80 Stat. 980. In Morse v. Boswell, 4th Cir., August 26, 1968, 401 F.2d 544, we denied relief to other reservists similarly situated. Additionally, we conclude that 10 U.S.C. § 673a did not by implication either repeal or render void Public Law 89-687.

*58 The appellees’ motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s order denying the issuance of writs of habeas corpus is granted.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The appellants’ army reserve units were ordered to active duty under Public Law 89-687, 80 Stat. 980. In Morse v. Boswell, 4th Cir., August 26, 1968, 401 F.2d 544, we denied relief to other reservists similarly situated. Additionally, we conclude that 10 U.S.C. § 673a did not by implication either repeal or render void Public Law 89-687.

*58 The appellees’ motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s order denying the issuance of writs of habeas corpus is granted.

Judgment affirmed.

Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin, 402 F.2d 57 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

402 F.2d 57 (Joel Felberbaum v. Major General v. J. MacLaughlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related