JOEL EDWARD CHANDLER v. MOTIVEPOWER, INC.
This text of JOEL EDWARD CHANDLER v. MOTIVEPOWER, INC. (JOEL EDWARD CHANDLER v. MOTIVEPOWER, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JOEL EDWARD CHANDLER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1608 ) MOTIVEPOWER, INC., ) ) Appellee. ) )
Opinion filed March 16, 2018.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Keith P. Spoto, Judge.
Jeffrey A. Rapkin of the Law Offices of Jeffrey A. Rapkin, Port Charlotte, for Appellant.
David B. Shelton and Damien A. Orato of Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order granting summary judgment without further
comment. However, we dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the portion of the appeal
challenging the trial court's reservation of jurisdiction on attorney fees. See, e.g., Card
v. Card, 122 So. 3d 436, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing the portion of the appeal
challenging attorney fees because not only was the order ambiguous as to entitlement but it also failed to set an amount of fees thereby rendering that portion of the final
judgment nonfinal and nonappealable).
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.
KELLY, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOEL EDWARD CHANDLER v. MOTIVEPOWER, INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-edward-chandler-v-motivepower-inc-fladistctapp-2018.