Joel D. v. Kelly O.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Joel D. v. Kelly O.

32 A.D.3d 1236, 820 N.Y.S.2d 913

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.3d 1236 (Joel D. v. Kelly O.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joel D. v. Kelly O., 32 A.D.3d 1236, 820 N.Y.S.2d 913 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), entered December 28, 2004 in two proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted the parties joint custody of the child, designated the mother as the primary residential parent, denied the mother’s request for the child to relocate with the mother, [1237]*1237and ordered that the child’s residence shall not be relocated more than a 30-mile travel distance from the father’s residence without prior court approval or the parties’ consent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), entered December 28, 2004 in two proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted the parties joint custody of the child, designated the mother as the primary residential parent, denied the mother’s request for the child to relocate with the mother, [1237]*1237and ordered that the child’s residence shall not be relocated more than a 30-mile travel distance from the father’s residence without prior court approval or the parties’ consent.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs. Present — Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Scudder, Kehoe and Green, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.3d 1236, 820 N.Y.S.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joel-d-v-kelly-o-nyappdiv-2006.