Joeffre Kolosky v. City of Brooklyn Park
This text of 326 F. App'x 982 (Joeffre Kolosky v. City of Brooklyn Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Joeffre Kolosky appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. After de novo review, see Olsen v. Mukasey, 541 F.3d 827, 830 (8th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2178, 173 L.Ed.2d 1156 (2009), we conclude the dismissal of Kolosky’s complaint was proper for the-reasons stated by the district court. We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Kolosky’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, because Kolosky failed to demonstrate that he had insufficient resources to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
326 F. App'x 982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joeffre-kolosky-v-city-of-brooklyn-park-ca8-2009.