Joeffre Kolosky v. City of Brooklyn Park

326 F. App'x 982
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 22, 2009·No. 08-1876·Unpublished

Opinion

*983 PER CURIAM.

Joeffre Kolosky appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. After de novo review, see Olsen v. Mukasey, 541 F.3d 827, 830 (8th Cir.2008), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2178, 173 L.Ed.2d 1156 (2009), we conclude the dismissal of Kolosky’s complaint was proper for the-reasons stated by the district court. We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s denial of Kolosky’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, because Kolosky failed to demonstrate that he had insufficient resources to pay the filing fee. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joeffre Kolosky v. City of Brooklyn Park, 326 F. App'x 982 (8th Cir. 2009).

326 F. App'x 982 (Joeffre Kolosky v. City of Brooklyn Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olsen v. Mukasey
541 F.3d 827 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)
Winget v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
129 S. Ct. 2159 (Supreme Court, 2009)