Joe Y. Rogers, III v. Sandra Rogers Miller, as Independent Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Joe Y. Rogers, Jr.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Joe Y. Rogers, III v. Sandra Rogers Miller, as Independent Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Joe Y. Rogers, Jr.

DecidedFebruary 2, 2023

Docket14-22-00464-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Joe Y. Rogers, III v. Sandra Rogers Miller, as Independent Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Joe Y. Rogers, Jr. (Joe Y. Rogers, III v. Sandra Rogers Miller, as Independent Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Joe Y. Rogers, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joe Y. Rogers, III v. Sandra Rogers Miller, as Independent Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Joe Y. Rogers, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion denied and Order filed February 2, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-22-00464-CV ____________

JOE Y. ROGERS, III, Appellant

V.

SANDRA ROGERS MILLER, AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR WITH WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF JOE Y. ROGERS, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Williamson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17-0461-CP4A

ORDER Appellant’s brief was originally due October 24, 2022. We granted three extensions of time to file appellant’s brief until January 23, 2023. When we granted the final extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On January 26, 2023, appellant proceeding pro se filed a further request for extension of time to file his brief. We deny the request and issue the following order. We order appellant to file a brief with the clerk of this court on or before February 23, 2023. If appellant does not timely file the brief as ordered, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Zimmerer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion denied and Order filed February 2, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-22-00464-CV ____________

JOE Y. ROGERS, III, Appellant

V.

SANDRA ROGERS MILLER, AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR WITH WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF JOE Y. ROGERS, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Williamson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 17-0461-CP4A

ORDER Appellant’s brief was originally due October 24, 2022. We granted three extensions of time to file appellant’s brief until January 23, 2023. When we granted the final extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On January 26, 2023, appellant proceeding pro se filed a further request for extension of time to file his brief. We deny the request and issue the following order. We order appellant to file a brief with the clerk of this court on or before February 23, 2023. If appellant does not timely file the brief as ordered, the appeal is subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Zimmerer.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Joe Y. Rogers, III v. Sandra Rogers Miller, as Independent Administrator With Will Annexed of the Estate of Joe Y. Rogers, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-y-rogers-iii-v-sandra-rogers-miller-as-independent-administrator-texapp-2023.