Joe Wells v. Christian Hospital

110 F. App'x 738
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 13, 2004
Docket03-3612
StatusUnpublished

This text of 110 F. App'x 738 (Joe Wells v. Christian Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Wells v. Christian Hospital, 110 F. App'x 738 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joe Wells appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his action under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, against his former employer. Having carefully conducted de novo review, see Meyers v. Neb. Health and Human Servs., 324 F.3d 655, 658-59 (8th Cir.2003), we agree with the district court that the instant complaint is untimely, and that neither Wells’s illness nor his lack of counsel during the period of time when he was required to file his suit justifies equitable tolling of the limitations period. We also find no abuse of discretion in the district court’s refusal to appoint counsel for Wells in this case.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Wells’s pending motions.

1

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vicky Meyers v. Nebraska Health And Human Services
324 F.3d 655 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 F. App'x 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-wells-v-christian-hospital-ca8-2004.