Joe Vittonel, Jr. v. BNSF Railway Company
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-10-00382-CV
JOE VITTONEL, JR., Appellant v.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellee
From the 21st District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 25,152
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Joe Vittonel, Jr. appeals from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment
in favor of BNSF Railway Company. The clerk’s record in this appeal is past due. In a
letter dated December 15, 2010, the Clerk of this Court notified Vittonel that the clerk’s
record had apparently not been filed because he had failed to pay or make
arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for the preparation of the clerk’s record. In the same
letter, the Clerk of this Court warned Vittonel that he must pay or make arrangements
to pay the clerk’s fee and notify this Court of the actions taken within 21 days after the date of the letter or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 37.3(b). More than 21 days have passed, and we have not been notified whether
Vittonel paid or made arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Id.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 19, 2011 [CV06]
Vittonel v. BNSF Railway Co. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joe Vittonel, Jr. v. BNSF Railway Company (Joe Vittonel, Jr. v. BNSF Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.