Joe v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Joe v. State

123 S.E. 49, 32 Ga. App. 326, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 368

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 13, 1924

Docket15389

StatusPublished

This text of 123 S.E. 49 (Joe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joe v. State, 123 S.E. 49, 32 Ga. App. 326, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 368 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. There being no insistence upon the special assignments of error in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, and the trial judge having approved the finding of the jury, there is no legal reason why the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial should be set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and, Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. There being no insistence upon the special assignments of error in the amendment to the motion for a new trial, and the trial judge having approved the finding of the jury, there is no legal reason why the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial should be set aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and, Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 S.E. 49, 32 Ga. App. 326, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-v-state-gactapp-1924.