Joe v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Joe v. State

38 Ala. 422

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 38 Ala. 422 (Joe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joe v. State, 38 Ala. 422 (Ala. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

STONE, J. —

[1.] The confessions given in evidence in this case against the prisoner’s objections, were clearly inadmissible under the rule laid down by this court. — See Bob v. The State, 32 Ala. 266, and authorities cited.

[2.] The charge asked should also have been given. — ? See Mose v. The State, 36 Ala. 211, and the criticism of the language of the charge, pp. 230-1.

The other questions argued are not raised by the record, and we need not consider them.

Reversed and remanded, and the prisoner will remain "in custody until discharged by due course of law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STONE, J. —

[1.] The confessions given in evidence in this case against the prisoner’s objections, were clearly inadmissible under the rule laid down by this court. — See Bob v. The State, 32 Ala. 266, and authorities cited.

[2.] The charge asked should also have been given. — ? See Mose v. The State, 36 Ala. 211, and the criticism of the language of the charge, pp. 230-1.

The other questions argued are not raised by the record, and we need not consider them.

Reversed and remanded, and the prisoner will remain "in custody until discharged by due course of law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 Ala. 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-v-state-ala-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack