Joe v. Garland
Opinion
1 2 3 4
5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JIMMY JOE, 9 Petitioner, Case No. C21-998-MJP-MLP 10 v. ORDER 11 MERRICK GARLAND, et al., 12 Respondents. 13
14 Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Michelle L. 15 Peterson, United States Magistrate Judge, any objections or responses to that, and the remaining 16 record, the Court finds and ORDERS: 17 (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. 18 (2) The Government’s motion to dismiss (dkt. #7) is GRANTED in part and 19 DENIED in part. 20 (3) Petitioner’s habeas petition (dkt. # 1) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 21 (4) Petitioner’s request for release is DENIED. 22 23 1 (5) Petitioner’s request for a bond hearing is GRANTED. Within 30 days of the date 2 of this order, the Government shall provide Petitioner with a bond hearing pursuant to Diouf v. 3 Napolitano, 634 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 2011). 4 (6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge
5 Peterson. 6 Dated this 16th day of November, 2021. A 7 8 Marsha J. Pechman 9 United States Senior District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joe v. Garland (Joe v. Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.