Joe v. Funderburk

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 31, 2007
• Docket: 06-7704
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7704

RODERICK JOE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM B. FUNDERBURK, Clerk of Court for Marlboro County; ROBERT E. WARD, Deputy Director; DIVISION OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SERVICES; ROBERT E. PETERSON, Deputy General Counsel; JOHN DAVIS; BARNEY LOYD, Associate Warden; WHITNEY SMITH, Captain; LIEUTENANT COIDEN; SERGEANT LUX; SERGEANT ARFLIN; OFFICER GLENN; J. C. COUNTS, Associate Warden; RICHARD C. BEARDEN, MD; SCDC ADA COORDINATOR; COUNSELOR FOX, Mental Health Counselor at Evans Correctional Institution; COUNSELOR MOSES, Mental Health Counselor at Evans Correctional Institution; DIVISION OF INVESTIGATIONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (8:06-cv-00119-GRA)

Submitted: January 25, 2007 Decided: January 31, 2007

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roderick Joe, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Roderick Joe appeals the district court’s order adopting

the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Joe v. Funderburk, No. 8:06-cv-00119-GRA

(D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -