Joe Thompson A/K/A Joe L. Thompson v. American Express National Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2025·No. 5D2024-3496·Published

Opinion

FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 5D2024-3496 LT Case No. 05-2024-SC-35757 _____________________________

JOE THOMPSON A/K/A JOE L. THOMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the County Court for Brevard County. Kenneth Friedland, Judge.

Joe L. Thompson, Merritt Island, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

August 1, 2025

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Ciotti v. Hubsch, 302 So. 3d 497, 499 (Fla. 5th DCA 2020) (“The effect of a default, such as the one entered against [the defendant] in this case, is that a defendant admits to all well- pleaded allegations of a complaint, including a plaintiff’s entitlement to liquidated damages.” (citing Bowman v. Kingsland Dev., Inc., 432 So. 2d 660, 662 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983))); Sarasota Est. & Jewelry Buyers, Inc. v. Joseph Gad, Inc., 25 So. 3d 619, 621 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (recognizing that a trial court may award liquidated damages without notice to the defaulted defendant).

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe Thompson A/K/A Joe L. Thompson v. American Express National Bank, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Joe Thompson A/K/A Joe L. Thompson v. American Express National Bank (Joe Thompson A/K/A Joe L. Thompson v. American Express National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sarasota Estate & Jewelry Buyers, Inc. v. Joseph Gad, Inc.
25 So. 3d 619 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Bowman v. Kingsland Development, Inc.
432 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)