Joe T. Barrera v. Roscoe, Snyder & Pacific Railway Company

503 F.2d 1058
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 8, 1974·No. 73-3731·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We have given careful consideration to the contentions of the parties as set forth in their well-prepared briefs and further amplified at oral argument. It is our opinion that the district court arrived at the proper conclusion and that the appellant has not presented any valid basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment entered for appellee by the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe T. Barrera v. Roscoe, Snyder & Pacific Railway Company, 503 F.2d 1058 (5th Cir. 1974).

503 F.2d 1058 (Joe T. Barrera v. Roscoe, Snyder & Pacific Railway Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nichols v. Pabtex, Inc.
151 F. Supp. 2d 772 (E.D. Texas, 2001)
Smoot v. New York Susquehanna & Western Railway Corp.
707 F. Supp. 629 (N.D. New York, 1989)
Hopgood v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
458 N.E.2d 525 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1983)
Thate v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
595 S.W.2d 591 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1980)