Joe Richard Randle v. the State of Texas
This text of Joe Richard Randle v. the State of Texas (Joe Richard Randle v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 8, 2024
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00314-CR ——————————— JOE RICHARD RANDLE, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 177th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1739960
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Joe Richard Randle, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of evading
arrest or detention with a vehicle. In accordance with appellant’s plea agreement
with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant to two years’ imprisonment.
Appellant, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. In a plea-bargain case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that were
raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after getting the trial court’s
permission to appeal. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P.
25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant
has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record. TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(d); see Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Here,
the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification that this is a plea-
bargain case and that appellant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2),
(d); Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 615. Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must
dismiss this appeal without further action. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680
(Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain
whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a),
must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for
the appeal.”).
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dismiss any
pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joe Richard Randle v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-richard-randle-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.