Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 22, 2012·No. 02-11-00343-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00343-CV

JOE REECE APPELLANT

V.

CITIMORTGAGE, INC. APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On February 27, 2012, we notified appellant that his brief had not been

filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R.

App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution

unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court

within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for

want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: March 22, 2012

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc. (Joe Reece v. Citimortgage, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.