Joe R. Long, and Teresa Long v. United States

575 F.2d 79, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5246, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10715
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 14, 1978
Docket76-3270
StatusPublished

This text of 575 F.2d 79 (Joe R. Long, and Teresa Long v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe R. Long, and Teresa Long v. United States, 575 F.2d 79, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5246, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10715 (5th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district judge, after a full bench trial, decided this income tax refund suit adversely to the taxpayers. The suit was generated by the Commissioner’s rejection of the taxpayers’ attempted deduction of one-half of the alleged losses of the husband’s joint venture with Mr. Long’s former law partner, Jake Jacobsen, relative to the operation of two apartment complexes. The Longs paid the deficiency, filed an unsuccessful claim for refund, and timely brought suit.

The judgment below for the United States was supported by the district judge’s careful, complete and well-documented Memorandum Opinion, reported at 451 F.Supp. 1009 (D.C.1976). Our consideration of the briefs, the record, and oral argument persuades us that the judgment was correct, for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district court, which we adopt.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Long v. United States
451 F. Supp. 1009 (W.D. Texas, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F.2d 79, 42 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5246, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 10715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-r-long-and-teresa-long-v-united-states-ca5-1978.