JOE N. CLARK v. DONALD PINKARD
This text of JOE N. CLARK v. DONALD PINKARD (JOE N. CLARK v. DONALD PINKARD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ April 17, 2025
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A25A1449. JOE N. CLARK v. DONALD PINKARD et al.
Prison inmate Joe N. Clark has filed this direct appeal of the trial court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We lack jurisdiction. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1996, an appeal in a civil action filed by a prisoner must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. See OCGA § 42-12-8, cross-referencing OCGA § 5-6-35; Jones v. Townsend, 267 Ga. 489, 490 (480 SE2d 24) (1997). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Because Clark was incarcerated when he filed this civil action, his failure to comply with the discretionary review procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Jones, 267 Ga. at 490-491.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 04/17/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JOE N. CLARK v. DONALD PINKARD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-n-clark-v-donald-pinkard-gactapp-2025.