Joe Medina Escobar v. United States Postal Service et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided July 8, 2026·No. 2:26-cv-00392·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3

4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 JOE MEDINA ESCOBAR, CASE NO. 2:26-cv-00392-JHC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE ET 11 AL.,

12 Defendants. 13

14 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for limited early discovery. Dkt. # 7. Based on 15 Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe, 319 F.R.D. 299 (E.D. Cal. 2016), and the authorities cited therein, 16 the Court GRANTS the motion in part and allows Plaintiff to seek the discovery at issue from 17 Defendant United States Postal Service. But it does not appear that Plaintiff has yet served that 18 Defendant. To obtain the requested discovery, then, Plaintiff must first serve Defendant United 19 States Postal Service and then follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Civil 20 Rules regarding discovery. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff leave to conduct such discovery until 21 September 1, 2026. It also EXTENDS Plaintiff’s deadline to serve Defendant “John Doe” until 22 October 1, 2026. 23 // 24 1 Dated this 8th day of July, 2026. Joka 4. Chu 3 John H. Chun United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe Medina Escobar v. United States Postal Service et al., (W.D. Wash. 2026).

Joe Medina Escobar v. United States Postal Service et al. (Joe Medina Escobar v. United States Postal Service et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Malibu Media, LLC v. Doe
319 F.R.D. 299 (E.D. California, 2016)