Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Joe M. v. Annette G.

Joe M. v. Annette G.

208 A.D.2d 928, 618 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10601
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1994
StatusPublished

This text of 208 A.D.2d 928 (Joe M. v. Annette G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe M. v. Annette G., 208 A.D.2d 928, 618 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 5 to establish paternity and for an order of visitation, the petitioner appeals from an order of the [929]*929Family Court, Kings County (Burstein, J.), dated September 17, 1992, which dismissed the branch of the petition which was for an order of visitation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record contains substantial evidence that visitation with the petitioner, who is incarcerated, would be harmful to the parties’ infant daughter (Paul G. v Donna G., 175 AD2d 236). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul G. v. Donna G.
175 A.D.2d 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.D.2d 928, 618 N.Y.S.2d 567, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-m-v-annette-g-nyappdiv-1994.