Joe Juan Garcia v. State
This text of Joe Juan Garcia v. State (Joe Juan Garcia v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBERS 13-04-263-CR and 13-04-264-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
__________________________________________________________________
JOE JUAN GARCIA, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
__________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, JOE JUAN GARCIA, attempts to appeal his convictions for possession of cocaine and possession of a controlled substance. The trial court has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
On July 2, 2004 and July 9, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certifications and ordered counsel to: (1) review the records; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certifications.
On August 25, 2004, counsel filed letter briefs with this Court. Counsel’s responses fail to establish either that the certifications currently on file with this Court are incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.
The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 31st day of August, 2004.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joe Juan Garcia v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-juan-garcia-v-state-texapp-2004.