Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company
Opinion
Opinion issued August 20, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District
Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has
not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to
dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b),
42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required
fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company (Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.