Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company
This text of Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company (Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued August 20, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-15-00447-CV ——————————— JOE HENDERSON, Appellant V. TEXAS BELTING & MILL SUPPLY COMPANY, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1061068
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Joe Henderson, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX.
GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013), § 101.0411
(West Supp. 2014); Order Regarding Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District
Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 13-9127 (Tex. Aug. 16, 2013). Further, appellant has
not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to
dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 37.3(b),
42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required
fees and for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Lloyd.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joe Henderson v. Texas Belting & Mill Supply Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-henderson-v-texas-belting-mill-supply-company-texapp-2015.