Joe Hatcher v. Charles Beorn, M.D., Jimmy Dean, Nurse, Jewell Thornton, Nurse W.P. Rogers, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center

859 F.2d 150, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13733, 1988 WL 97390
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 1988
Docket88-7080
StatusUnpublished

This text of 859 F.2d 150 (Joe Hatcher v. Charles Beorn, M.D., Jimmy Dean, Nurse, Jewell Thornton, Nurse W.P. Rogers, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Hatcher v. Charles Beorn, M.D., Jimmy Dean, Nurse, Jewell Thornton, Nurse W.P. Rogers, Warden, Powhatan Correctional Center, 859 F.2d 150, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13733, 1988 WL 97390 (4th Cir. 1988).

Opinion

859 F.2d 150
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Joe HATCHER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles BEORN, M.D., Jimmy Dean, Nurse, Jewell Thornton,
Nurse W.P. Rogers, Warden, Powhatan Correctional
Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 88-7080.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 18, 1988.
Decided Sept. 15, 1988.

Joe Hatcher, appellant pro se.

Mary Sue Terry, Office of Attorney General, Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Joe Hatcher appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Hatcher v. Beorn, C/A No. 86-0849-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 9, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

However, we disapprove, as we must, that part of the district court's order relying on West v. Atkins, 815 F.2d 992 (4th Cir.1987) (en banc). See West v. Atkins, 56 U.S.L.W. --- (U.S. June 20, 1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 F.2d 150, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 13733, 1988 WL 97390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-hatcher-v-charles-beorn-md-jimmy-dean-nurse-je-ca4-1988.