Joe G. Murrah Et Ux. v. Fire Insurance Exchange
This text of 480 F.2d 613 (Joe G. Murrah Et Ux. v. Fire Insurance Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After this action on a fire insurance policy had been pending for fifteen months, plaintiff failed to have representation at a pretrial conference, the Court having granted an earlier motion for the withdrawal of counsel. The Court ordered that the case would be dismissed at a time certain unless prior thereto the plaintiffs showed good cause why the case should not be dismissed. No cause was shown. The case was dismissed for want of prosecution. We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
480 F.2d 613, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 9918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-g-murrah-et-ux-v-fire-insurance-exchange-ca5-1973.