Joe Freddie Fleming v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division

927 F.2d 824, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4430, 1991 WL 35676
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joe Freddie Fleming v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. Read the opinion of the Court — 954 F.2d 1109
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 19, 1991·No. 88-1334·Published

Opinion

*825 ON SUGGESTION FOR. REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 5, 1990, 5 Cir., 1990, 917 F.2d 850)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, POLITZ, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. *

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe Freddie Fleming v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, 927 F.2d 824, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 4430, 1991 WL 35676 (5th Cir. 1991).

927 F.2d 824 (Joe Freddie Fleming v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related