Joe Dwight Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 1, 1995·No. 10-94-00084-CR·Published

Opinion

Thomas v. State


IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-94-084-CR


     JOE DWIGHT THOMAS,

                                                                                              Appellant

     v.


     THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                                              Appellee


From the Criminal District Court #2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court # F93-54520-VI


MEMORANDUM OPINION


      Dwight Thomas' appointed attorney filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). On November 23, 1994, we granted the attorney's motion to withdraw in a per curiam order, finding that the appeal was without merit. See Johnson v. State, 885 S.W.2d 641 (Tex. App.—Waco 1994) (discussing procedures for Anders appeals). Thomas has not filed a pro-se brief or any requests for extensions. See id. at 647 & n.3. Thus, because we have no viable points of error to consider, the judgment is affirmed. See Tex. R. App. P. 81(b)(2), 90(a).

                                                                                  PER CURIAM



Before Chief Justice Thomas,

          Justice Cummings, and

          Justice Vance

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed February 1, 1995

Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe Dwight Thomas v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).

Joe Dwight Thomas v. State (Joe Dwight Thomas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Johnson v. State
885 S.W.2d 641 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)