Joe Delegal v. United States

271 F.2d 279, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3210
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 27, 1959·No. 17725_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a denial by the District Court of a motion under F.R.Crim.P. 32(d), 18 U.S.C.A., to set aside a sentence of imprisonment and a prior plea of guilty to a one-count in *280 dictment charging violation of 26 U.S.C. A. § 5008(b) (1) (1955). The only basis for the motion was that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty the defendant, appellant here, was not personally present in court and the plea had been entered by his counsel without his knowledge or full consent. The District Judge heard the evidence and found that both at the time of the entry of the plea, November 10, 1958, and at the time of sentence, February 11, 1959, appellant and his counsel were present in court and the plea was knowingly made. Withdrawal of a plea of guilty is committed to the sound discretion of the District Court and no abuse of it is shown here. Williams v. United States, 5 Cir., 1951, 192 F.2d 39; Mitchell v. United States, 5 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 305.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joe Delegal v. United States, 271 F.2d 279, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3210 (5th Cir. 1959).

271 F.2d 279 (Joe Delegal v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andrew Leo Oksanen v. United States
362 F.2d 74 (Eighth Circuit, 1966)