Joe Christopher Zepeda v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 27, 2022
Docket07-22-00070-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Joe Christopher Zepeda v. the State of Texas (Joe Christopher Zepeda v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Christopher Zepeda v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

Nos. 07-22-00070-CR 07-22-00071-CR 07-22-00072-CR

JOE CHRISTOPHER ZEPEDA, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 222nd District Court Deaf Smith County, Texas Trial Court No. CR-14C-036, CR-13K-116, CR-13K-122, Honorable Roland D. Saul, Presiding

April 27, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PIRTLE and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant Joe Christopher Zepeda, proceeding pro se, appeals his convictions for

assault1 and failure to stop and render aid following a traffic accident.2 Appellant was

sentenced to fourteen years’ confinement for each offense on November 3, 2016.

Because no motion for new trial was filed, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due within

1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01.

2 See TEX. TRANSP. CODE ANN. § 550.021. thirty days after sentenced was imposed, by December 5, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P.

4.1(a), 26.2(a) (requiring a notice of appeal to be filed within thirty days after sentence is

imposed or within ninety days if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial).

Appellant did not file a notice of appeal until March 14, 2022.

The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to

hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). If a

notice of appeal is not timely filed, we have no option but to dismiss the appeal for want

of jurisdiction. Id. By letter of March 15, 2022, we notified Appellant of the consequences

of his late notice of appeal and directed him to show how we have jurisdiction over the

appeals. Appellant has filed a response but failed to demonstrate grounds for continuing

the appeals.

For these reasons, we dismiss the untimely appeals for want of jurisdiction.3

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

3 Appellant may be entitled to habeas relief by filing an application for writ of habeas corpus with

the clerk of the court in which the convictions being challenged were obtained, returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo, Ex Parte Mario Amaro
369 S.W.3d 196 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joe Christopher Zepeda v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-christopher-zepeda-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.