Joe Carroll Lineberger v. Talmadge Barnett Lieutenant Raynor Bobby Howell, and Captain Raynor

Fourth Circuit

Joe Carroll Lineberger v. Talmadge Barnett Lieutenant Raynor Bobby Howell, and Captain Raynor

60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24832, 1995 WL 419967

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJuly 14, 1995

Docket95-6587

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 823 (Joe Carroll Lineberger v. Talmadge Barnett Lieutenant Raynor Bobby Howell, and Captain Raynor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joe Carroll Lineberger v. Talmadge Barnett Lieutenant Raynor Bobby Howell, and Captain Raynor, 60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24832, 1995 WL 419967 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 823
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joe Carroll LINEBERGER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Talmadge BARNETT; Lieutenant Raynor; Bobby Howell,
Defendants--Appellees,
and
Captain Raynor, Defendant.

No. 95-6587.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Joe Carroll Lineberger, appellant pro se. William McBlief, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lineberger v. Barnett, No. CA-93-462-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 823
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Joe Carroll LINEBERGER, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Talmadge BARNETT; Lieutenant Raynor; Bobby Howell,
Defendants--Appellees,
and
Captain Raynor, Defendant.

No. 95-6587.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 22, 1995.
Decided: July 14, 1995.

Joe Carroll Lineberger, appellant pro se. William McBlief, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lineberger v. Barnett, No. CA-93-462-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24832, 1995 WL 419967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-carroll-lineberger-v-talmadge-barnett-lieutena-ca4-1995.