Joe C. Medellin, Jr. v. Rebecca Medellin
Opinion
jf ourtlj Court of
Antonio,
October 3, 2013
No. 04-1 3-00138-CV
Joe C. Medcllin. Jr..
Appellant
v.
Rebecca Medellin.
Appellee
Trial Courl Case No. 2005-CI-07696
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and the majority of the judges have determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. AFP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on November 6. 2013. to the following panel: Chief Justice Stone. Justice Barnard, and Justice Alvarez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. Aim1. P. 4,S.
Either parly may file a molion requesting (he Courl lo reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Courl in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. Sec 'Vex. R. Api1. I1. 39.8, Such a motion should be filed within ten (I 0) days from the date of this order.
It is so OR1>FRF1> on October 3. 2013.
^Catherine) Stone. Chief Justice
j. !
IN WITNESS WlIHRHOl- \ have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
ylL
courl on this October 3, 2013.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joe C. Medellin, Jr. v. Rebecca Medellin (Joe C. Medellin, Jr. v. Rebecca Medellin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.