Joe Butler, Jr. v. T.C. Outlaw

358 F. App'x 775
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 2010
Docket09-1610
StatusUnpublished

This text of 358 F. App'x 775 (Joe Butler, Jr. v. T.C. Outlaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Butler, Jr. v. T.C. Outlaw, 358 F. App'x 775 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Federal inmate Joe Butler appeals the district court’s 1 denial without prejudice of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Upon careful review, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying relief for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. See Kendrick v. Carlson, 995 F.2d 1440, 1447 (8th Cir.1993) (standard of review). We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jerry W. Cavaneau, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Frank Michael Kendrick v. Peter Carlson, Warden
995 F.2d 1440 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
358 F. App'x 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-butler-jr-v-tc-outlaw-ca8-2010.