Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 20, 2014
Docket01-14-00103-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr. (Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01-14-00103-CV

Trial court case number: D-1-GN-07-003482

Trial court: 98th District Court of Travis County

Generally, a notice of appeal is due within 30 days after the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. The deadline to file a notice of appeal is extended to 90 days after the date the judgment is signed if, within 30 days after the judgment is signed, any party files a motion for new trial, motion to modify the judgment, motion to reinstate, or, under certain circumstances, a request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. Id.; TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a), (g). The time to file a notice of appeal may also be extended if, within 15 days after the deadline to file the notice of appeal, a party properly files a motion for extension and the notice of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b), 26.3. Appellant appeals a judgment signed by the trial court on August 29, 2013. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on September 30, 2013. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 4, 329b. Therefore, appellant’s notice of appeal was due November 27, 2013. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on December 11, 2013. The Court will imply a motion for extension when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Rule 26.1, but within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Because appellant filed his notice of appeal within the 15-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 and provided a reasonable explanation for the late filing, we find that appellant’s notice of appeal is timely. Id. We DISMISS appellant’s motion for extension filed on December 16, 2013 as moot. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Justice Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 20, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joe Anthony Beames, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah Kay Davis v. Edwin Howard Hooks, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-anthony-beames-personal-representative-of-the--texapp-2014.