Joe Aitro v. Henry S. Clapper

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
• Decided: September 5, 2006
• Docket: 05-2896
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 05-2896 ___________

Joe Aitro, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Henry S. Clapper; David Munton; * Western District of Missouri. George Nichols; City of Lockwood, * Missouri; Lockwood, MO Police * [UNPUBLISHED] Department; Ryan Robison; Ruth * Cottingham; Tamara Dewild; Lathrop * & Gage, L.C., * * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: August 28, 2006 Filed: September 5, 2006 ___________

Before RILEY, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Joe Aitro (Aitro) appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint with prejudice. We dismiss the appeal with prejudice for failure to comply with the rules of appellate procedure. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(a)(2), 28(a); 8th Cir. R. 28A(f);

1 The Honorable Richard E. Dorr, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 834-35 n.46 (1975) (pro se litigants must comply with relevant rules of procedure); Haugen v. Sutherlin, 804 F.2d 490, 491 (8th Cir. 1986) (where appellant violated Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and Eighth Circuit Rules pertaining to form for briefs and record, holding that any further filings by appellant would result in sanctions and dismissing appeal as frivolous). Aitro’s request for oral argument and his motion seeking remand to state court are denied. ______________________________

-2-