Joe Adelman v. United States
This text of 440 F.2d 991 (Joe Adelman v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
440 F.2d 991
71-1 USTC P 15,990
Joe ADELMAN, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 25443.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 3, 1971.
Eli Grubic, Reno, Nev., Ben H. Rudnick, of Behrstock & Rudnick, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, William A. Friedlander, Ann E. Belanger, Attys., Tax Division, Washington, D.C., Robert L. Meyer, U.S. Atty., Charles H. Magnuson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before ELY, CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons set forth by District Judge Gray in his 'Memorandum of Decision,' reported at 304 F.Supp. 599 (C.D.Cal.1969).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 F.2d 991, 27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1464, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joe-adelman-v-united-states-ca9-1971.