Jody White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 27, 2019
Docket19A-CR-46
StatusPublished

This text of Jody White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (Jody White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jody White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), (Ind. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Aug 27 2019, 10:22 am court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court estoppel, or the law of the case. Court of Appeals and Tax Court

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Marielena Duerring Curtis T. Hill, Jr. South Bend, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Caroline G. Templeton Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Jody White, August 27, 2019 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No. 19A-CR-46 v. Appeal from the St. Joseph Circuit Court State of Indiana, The Honorable John E. Broden, Appellee-Plaintiff. Judge The Honorable Andre B. Gammage, Magistrate Trial Court Cause No. 71C01-1711-FC-41

Mathias, Judge.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-46 | August 27, 2019 Page 1 of 4 [1] Jody White (“White”) pleaded guilty in St. Joseph Circuit Court to Class C

felony non-support of a dependent. The trial court sentenced White to seven

years at the Indiana Department of Corrections (“DOC”), with three years

suspended, three years of probation, and seventy-five days of jail time credit.

White appeals and argues his sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of

the offense and the character of the offender. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History [2] White is the father of P.W., born in 1996, and E.W., born in 1999. White failed

to provide child support between June 3, 1997 and October 31, 2016. The State

charged White with; (I) Class C felony non-support of dependent children in an

amount greater than $15,000, (II) Level 5 felony non-support of a dependent

child, and (III) Level 6 felony non-support of a dependent child. White has a

prior felony conviction for non-support of a dependent and five contempt

citations for failure to pay child support. Appellant’s Confidential App. p. 57;

Tr. pp. 20–21.

[3] White failed to appear at a hearing on June 20, 2018, and the Court issued a

bench warrant for his arrest on July 18, 2018. Appellant’s Confidential App. p.

15–16. White was served with the bench warrant on October 1, 2018, three

months after his failure to appear. White pleaded guilty to the Class C felony on

October 24, 2018 without the benefit of a plea agreement, and the State

dismissed the Level 5 and Level 6 felonies. At sentencing, White did not

dispute that he owed $35,670.48 in child support. Tr. p. 24.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-46 | August 27, 2019 Page 2 of 4 [4] The trial court sentenced White to seven years in the DOC, with seventy-five

days jail credit time, three years suspended, and three years of probation. One

of the conditions of his probation is the payment of child support. White now

appeals his sentence.

Discussion and Decision [5] Appellate courts may revise a sentence if the court finds the sentence is

inappropriate in light of the nature of the offense and the character of the

offender. Ind. Appellate Rule 7(B). The question is whether the defendant’s

sentence is inappropriate, not whether another sentence is more appropriate.

King v. State, 894 N.E.2d 265, 268 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008). The principle role of

Rule 7(B) is to “leaven the outliers” rather than to “achieve a perceived ‘correct’

result,” and thus appellate courts conduct Rule 7(B) sentencing review with

substantial deference to the trial court’s sentencing decision. Cardwell v. State, 895

N.E.2d 1219, 1225 (Ind. 2008); Knapp v. State, 9 N.E.3d 1274, 1292 (Ind. 2014).

[6] White argues his sentence is inappropriate because his offense was non-violent,

his children are now independent, he has accepted responsibility, and he was

suffering from factors that affect his ability to pay his support obligation,

including unemployment, homelessness and medical emergencies. Appellant’s

Br. at 7–8. He argues he should be placed on Community Corrections for two

years, as recommended by the probation department, so that he can participate

in work release in order to repay child support and maintain a relationship with

his children. Id. We cannot conclude that White’s sentence is inappropriate in

light of the nature of his offense and the character of the offender.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-46 | August 27, 2019 Page 3 of 4 [7] In regard to the nature of the offense, the length of time and the amount of the

arrearage are appropriate considerations in assessing the severity of the crime.

Boss v. State, 702 N.E.2d 782, 785 (Ind. Ct. App. 1998). A person commits a

Class C felony of non-support of a child if the total amount of unpaid child

support for one or more children is at least $15,000. Indiana Code 35-46-1-5(a)

(2001). White owes over $35,000, more than twice the minimum owed to

qualify as a Class C felony. He failed to consistently pay child support from

June 3, 1997 to October 31, 2016, a period of nineteen years.

[8] In regard to the character of the offender, White has been cited for contempt of

court on five separate occasions for failing to pay child support and has a prior

felony criminal conviction for non-support of a dependent. Tr. pp. 20–21.

White was placed on probation twice for the felony non-support and twice

violated that probation. Id. The trial court considered and rejected White’s

request to be placed on Community Corrections, in part because of this long

history of not paying child support and prior convictions.

[9] A sentence of seven years in the DOC with three years suspended and three

years of probation is not inappropriate in light of the significant amount of

money owed over two decades and White’s prior convictions for failure to pay

child support.

[10] Affirmed.

May, J., and Brown, J., concur.

Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-46 | August 27, 2019 Page 4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardwell v. State
895 N.E.2d 1219 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2008)
King v. State
894 N.E.2d 265 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2008)
Boss v. State
702 N.E.2d 782 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1998)
Randy L. Knapp v. State of Indiana
9 N.E.3d 1274 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jody White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jody-white-v-state-of-indiana-mem-dec-indctapp-2019.