Jodoin v. Maine Central Railroad
This text of 102 A. 1051 (Jodoin v. Maine Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case falls so completely within the facts and law laid down in the recent opinion of Blanchard, Administrator, v. Maine Central Railroad Company, 116 Maine, 179, that we deem it unnecessary to discuss either the law or the facts. If we adhere to the doctrine of this opinion and the cases there cited, only one conclusion can be drawn from the facts in the case at bar. As we see no reason for departing from the rule in the Blanchard case, we must hold that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Motion sustained. H. E. Holmes, and W. R. Pattangall, for plaintiff. White & Carter, for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 A. 1051, 117 Me. 552, 1917 Me. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jodoin-v-maine-central-railroad-me-1917.