Jodoin v. Maine Central Railroad

102 A. 1051, 117 Me. 552, 1917 Me. LEXIS 132
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedDecember 21, 1917
StatusPublished

This text of 102 A. 1051 (Jodoin v. Maine Central Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jodoin v. Maine Central Railroad, 102 A. 1051, 117 Me. 552, 1917 Me. LEXIS 132 (Me. 1917).

Opinion

This case falls so completely within the facts and law laid down in the recent opinion of Blanchard, Administrator, v. Maine Central Railroad Company, 116 Maine, 179, that we deem it unnecessary to discuss either the law or the facts. If we adhere to the doctrine of this opinion and the cases there cited, only one conclusion can be drawn from the facts in the case at bar. As we see no reason for departing from the rule in the Blanchard case, we must hold that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Motion sustained. H. E. Holmes, and W. R. Pattangall, for plaintiff. White & Carter, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A. 1051, 117 Me. 552, 1917 Me. LEXIS 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jodoin-v-maine-central-railroad-me-1917.