Jodka v. City of Cleveland

34 N.E.3d 123, 143 Ohio St. 3d 1201
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 12, 2015
DocketNo. 2014-0480
StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.E.3d 123 (Jodka v. City of Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jodka v. City of Cleveland, 34 N.E.3d 123, 143 Ohio St. 3d 1201 (Ohio 2015).

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 N.E.3d 123, 143 Ohio St. 3d 1201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jodka-v-city-of-cleveland-ohio-2015.