Jociel Pedroza-Macias v. Eric Holder, Jr.

459 F. App'x 589
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 2011
Docket10-71324
StatusUnpublished

This text of 459 F. App'x 589 (Jociel Pedroza-Macias v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jociel Pedroza-Macias v. Eric Holder, Jr., 459 F. App'x 589 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jociel Pedroza Pedroza-Macias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Salviejo-Fernandez v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 1063, 1066 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Pedroza-Macias’ 2008 conviction for violating California Health & Safety Code § 11359 is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) that renders him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a) (2) (A) (iii), and ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3). See id. at 1066 (“A state drug offense is an ‘aggravated felony for immigration purposes ... if it would be punishable as a felony under federal drug laws.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
459 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jociel-pedroza-macias-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.