Jociel Pedroza-Macias v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 459 F. App'x 589 (Jociel Pedroza-Macias v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Jociel Pedroza Pedroza-Macias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Salviejo-Fernandez v. Gonzales, 455 F.3d 1063, 1066 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.
Pedroza-Macias’ 2008 conviction for violating California Health & Safety Code § 11359 is an aggravated felony under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) that renders him removable under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a) (2) (A) (iii), and ineligible for cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3). See id. at 1066 (“A state drug offense is an ‘aggravated felony for immigration purposes ... if it would be punishable as a felony under federal drug laws.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
459 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jociel-pedroza-macias-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2011.