Jochnowitz v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jochnowitz v. Mack

39 A.D.2d 931, 333 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4332

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 12, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 39 A.D.2d 931 (Jochnowitz v. Mack) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jochnowitz v. Mack, 39 A.D.2d 931, 333 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4332 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Alvin D. Mack and Rose Halperin as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 20, 1972 for the party position of Assembly District Leader (male and female, respectively) of the 29th Assembly District, Part B, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 9, 1972, which, inter alia, denied the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for a full hearing and a new determination. The questions of fact'have not been considered on this appeal. In our opinion, it is unnecessary to decide the issue of fraud because the petitioners were not given an opportunity for a full hearing. In order that the issue may be decided, a full hearing is necessary to determine the facts. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Alvin D. Mack and Rose Halperin as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 20, 1972 for the party position of Assembly District Leader (male and female, respectively) of the 29th Assembly District, Part B, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 9, 1972, which, inter alia, denied the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, and proceeding remanded to the Special Term for a full hearing and a new determination. The questions of fact'have not been considered on this appeal. In our opinion, it is unnecessary to decide the issue of fraud because the petitioners were not given an opportunity for a full hearing. In order that the issue may be decided, a full hearing is necessary to determine the facts. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Christ, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 A.D.2d 931, 333 N.Y.S.2d 1005, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jochnowitz-v-mack-nyappdiv-1972.