Jochamowitz v. Dollar Systems, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jochamowitz v. Dollar Systems, Inc.

619 So. 2d 33, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6205, 1993 WL 192119

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 1993·No. No. 92-3596·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash service of process. We agree and reverse, concluding that the record does not support the conclusion that the Florida condominium was the “usual place of abode” of the Peruvian appellant. See Moschetta v. Atlantic National Bank of Broward, 540 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., STONE, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash service of process. We agree and reverse, concluding that the record does not support the conclusion that the Florida condominium was the “usual place of abode” of the Peruvian appellant. See Moschetta v. Atlantic National Bank of Broward, 540 So.2d 166 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., STONE, J., and WALDEN, JAMES H., Senior Judge, concur.

Jochamowitz v. Dollar Systems, Inc., 619 So. 2d 33, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6205, 1993 WL 192119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

619 So. 2d 33 (Jochamowitz v. Dollar Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related