Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Jobilng v. Hertz Corp.

Jobilng v. Hertz Corp.

49 A.D.2d 717, 374 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10636
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 16, 1975
StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 717 (Jobilng v. Hertz Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jobilng v. Hertz Corp., 49 A.D.2d 717, 374 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 2,1975, [718]*718unamimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant one bill of $40 costs and disbursements. The court correctly decided, on the law and the facts, that the defendant, the Hertz Corporation, lessor of the truck involved in this accident and a self-insurer, should be required to defend the action for wrongful death and personal injury. (MVAIC v Continental Nat. Amer. Group Co., 35 NY2d 260; Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 388.) Concur— Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli, and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Continental National American Group Co.
319 N.E.2d 182 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 717, 374 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jobilng-v-hertz-corp-nyappdiv-1975.