Jobilng v. Hertz Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Jobilng v. Hertz Corp.

49 A.D.2d 717, 374 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10636

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 16, 1975·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 2,1975, [718] unamimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant one bill of $40 costs and disbursements. The court correctly decided, on the law and the facts, that the defendant, the Hertz Corporation, lessor of the truck involved in this accident and a self-insurer, should be required to defend the action for wrongful death and personal injury. (MVAIC v Continental Nat. Amer. Group Co., 35 NY2d 260; Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 388.) Concur— Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli, and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered May 2,1975, [718] unamimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellant one bill of $40 costs and disbursements. The court correctly decided, on the law and the facts, that the defendant, the Hertz Corporation, lessor of the truck involved in this accident and a self-insurer, should be required to defend the action for wrongful death and personal injury. (MVAIC v Continental Nat. Amer. Group Co., 35 NY2d 260; Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 388.) Concur— Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman, Capozzoli, and Nunez, JJ.

Jobilng v. Hertz Corp., 49 A.D.2d 717, 374 N.Y.S.2d 293, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

49 A.D.2d 717 (Jobilng v. Hertz Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related