Jobe v. Jobe

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jobe v. Jobe

202 So. 2d 791

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 5, 1967

DocketNo. I-417

StatusPublished

This text of 202 So. 2d 791 (Jobe v. Jobe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jobe v. Jobe, 202 So. 2d 791 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from that portion of a final decree in a divorce case which awarded custody of the parties’ four-year-old son to the father. The only question which was raised for our consideration by the appellant was the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the Chancellor’s award of custody.

A careful review of the record on appeal, the briefs, and arguments herein indicates that there was sufficient competent evidence presented to the Chancellor to uphold the granting of custody to the.father. A party seeking to reverse a custody order has the burden of establishing that it is unreasonable or that the Chancellor abused his discretion in determining the matter. Dworkis v. Dworkis, (Fla.App.3d 1959) 111 So.2d 70, 72 A.L.R.2d 1189; Borden v. Borden, (Fla.App.3d 1966) 193 So.2d 15.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from that portion of a final decree in a divorce case which awarded custody of the parties’ four-year-old son to the father. The only question which was raised for our consideration by the appellant was the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the Chancellor’s award of custody.

A careful review of the record on appeal, the briefs, and arguments herein indicates that there was sufficient competent evidence presented to the Chancellor to uphold the granting of custody to the.father. A party seeking to reverse a custody order has the burden of establishing that it is unreasonable or that the Chancellor abused his discretion in determining the matter. Dworkis v. Dworkis, (Fla.App.3d 1959) 111 So.2d 70, 72 A.L.R.2d 1189; Borden v. Borden, (Fla.App.3d 1966) 193 So.2d 15.

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 So. 2d 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jobe-v-jobe-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack