Jobe v. International Insurance

1 F. Supp. 2d 1403, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22925, 1997 WL 896551
CourtDistrict Court, D. Arizona
DecidedJuly 10, 1997
DocketCIV 93-0074 PHX EHC
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 F. Supp. 2d 1403 (Jobe v. International Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jobe v. International Insurance, 1 F. Supp. 2d 1403, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22925, 1997 WL 896551 (D. Ariz. 1997).

Opinion

ORDER

CARROLL, District Judge.

On March 3,1995, Judge Muecke issued an order granting three motions for partial summary judgment filed by Plaintiffs and denying Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt.163). The parties subsequently agreed to mediate the dispute. (Dkt. 186 and 189). The parties thereafter settled the dispute and filed a Stipulation for Dismissal. (Dkt. 192, 194, and 195). Judge Muecke granted the parties’ Stipulation for Dismissal on May 24, 1996. Judge Muecke later retired from the bench.

On March 27, 1997, Defendant filed a “Motion to Withdraw March 25,1995 Opinion and Order” pursuant to the settlement negotiated by the parties. (Dkt.197). Defendant thereafter filed an “Amended Motion to Withdraw March 25, 1995 Opinion and Order.” (Dkt.198). The action was reassigned to Judge Rosenblatt, who recused, and the case was thereafter assigned to this Court to resolve the motions to withdraw. (Dkt.200).

Plaintiffs have not objected to either motion. However, the motions refer to an order issued on March 25, 1995; no order was issued on that date in this case and Defendant does not otherwise identify the order which it seeks to have withdrawn. Nevertheless, Defendant has notified this Court and Plaintiffs by correspondence that its motion is addressed towards Judge Mueeke’s order issued on March 3, 1995. Plaintiffs have not objected or otherwise responded to this letter of clarification.

The Clerk’s Office will be directed to place Defendant’s letter on the left side of the case file. Defendant’s motion to withdraw the March 25, 1995 order will be construed as a motion to withdraw the order issued on March 3, 1995 at docket number 163. Such motion will be granted. (Dkt.197). The Court will deny the amended motion to withdraw as moot. (Dkt.198).

The Court being fully advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk’s Office shall place the letter dated June 16, 1997 from James A. Lupo, Jr., counsel for Defendant, on the left side of the Court’s file.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Defendant’s motion for withdrawal to the extent that the order issued on March 3,1995 is hereby withdrawn in its entirety (Dkt.163). (Dkt.197).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying the amended motion to withdraw order (Dkt.198) and terminating this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Desert Ridge Resort LLC v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.
141 F. Supp. 3d 962 (D. Arizona, 2015)
Frank v. Lockwood
749 N.W.2d 443 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2008)
Streber v. Hunter
221 F.3d 701 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
Ronson v. Talesnick
33 F. Supp. 2d 347 (D. New Jersey, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 F. Supp. 2d 1403, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22925, 1997 WL 896551, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jobe-v-international-insurance-azd-1997.