Jobe v. Comm'r of Corr.

185 A.3d 594, 329 Conn. 906
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 6, 2018·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petitioner Momodou Lamin Jobe's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 181 Conn.App. 236, ___ A.3d ___ (2018), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review the petitioner's claim that the definition of `custody' in General Statutes § 52-466 should include individuals in the petitioner's circumstances, when the first opportunity to raise that claim was in the petitioner's reply brief because the petitioner had no notice that the respondent would raise an unpreserved alternative ground to affirm the habeas court's judgment?

"2. Does § 52-466 include habeas petitioners whose sentences have been fully served, who are in the custody of federal immigration authorities, and who could not have been aware of the need to challenge the constitutionality of their convictions until after serving their sentences?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jobe v. Comm'r of Corr., 185 A.3d 594, 329 Conn. 906 (Colo. 2018).

185 A.3d 594 (Jobe v. Comm'r of Corr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jobe v. Commissioner of Correction
334 Conn. 636 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)