Joaquin Alexandre Coll v. 11USAGROUP, LLC
This text of Joaquin Alexandre Coll v. 11USAGROUP, LLC (Joaquin Alexandre Coll v. 11USAGROUP, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed April 23, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1220 Lower Tribunal No. 21-26046 ________________
Joaquin Alexandre Coll, et al., Appellants,
vs.
11USAGroup, LLC, et al., Appellees.
An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Vivianne Del Rio, Judge.
The Scharf Appellate Group, and Erik W. Scharf; Kawel PLLC, and Andrew Paul Kawel, for appellants.
Kelley Legal, and Marissa D. Kelley and Dylan M. Fulop (Fort Lauderdale), for appellees.
Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Appellants Joaquin Alexandre Coll and Victoria Teng-Le appeal an
order denying their motion to amend their complaint to add claims for punitive
damages. We conclude Appellants failed to make a reasonable showing
which would provide a reasonable basis for recovery of punitive damages. §
768.72(1), Fla. Stat. (2024). Therefore, the trial court properly performed its
gatekeeping function. See Palm Bay Towers Condo. Ass’n v. Marrazza, 50
Fla. L. Weekly D104, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 2, 2025) (“Thus, the trial court
serves as a ‘gatekeeper,’ whose function is to assess whether there is a
reasonable evidentiary basis for recovery.” (citing Gattorno v. Souto, 390 So.
3d 134, 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024))).
In reaching this conclusion, we do not diminish the claims made, or the
injuries allegedly suffered, by the Appellants. “Nevertheless, there is nothing
in the showing made by [Appellants] in this case which makes a reasonable
showing that [Appellees’] actions were of a ‘gross and flagrant character,
evincing reckless disregard of human life, or of the safety of persons exposed
to its dangerous effects.’” Five Fran, LLC v. Davis, 50 Fla. L. Weekly D136,
at *3 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 8, 2025) (quoting Est. of Despain v. Avante Grp.,
Inc., 900 So. 2d 637, 640 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“To merit an award of punitive
damages, the defendant’s conduct must transcend the level of ordinary
negligence and enter the realm of willful and wanton misconduct.”)).
2 Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Joaquin Alexandre Coll v. 11USAGROUP, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joaquin-alexandre-coll-v-11usagroup-llc-fladistctapp-2025.