Joao Alexandres Dos Reis Franco v. Craig Meyer, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedNovember 18, 2025
Docket5:25-cv-09480
StatusUnknown

This text of Joao Alexandres Dos Reis Franco v. Craig Meyer, et al. (Joao Alexandres Dos Reis Franco v. Craig Meyer, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joao Alexandres Dos Reis Franco v. Craig Meyer, et al., (N.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 CRAIG H. MISSAKIAN (CABN 125202) United States Attorney 2 PAMELA T. JOHANN (CABN 145558) Assistant United States Attorney 3 Chief, Civil Division

4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 5 Telephone: (415) 436-7200 Fax: (415) 436-6748 6 pamela.johann@usdoj.gov

7 Attorneys for Federal Respondents

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11

12 JOAO ALEXANDRES DOS REIS FRANCO, ) No. 25-cv-08998-JSC 5:25-cv-09480-EKL ) 13 Petitioner ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

) TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE 14 v. ) EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 CRAIG MEYER, et al., ) ) 16 Respondents ) ) 17 18 19 Pursuant to the Court’s Order for Supplemental Briefing, Dkt. No. 11, the parties have met and 20 conferred regarding Petitioner’s district of confinement and hereby stipulate as follows: 21 1. Jurisdiction over this petition lies in the Eastern District of California rather than the 22 Northern District of California. Doe v. Garland, 109 F.4th 1188 (9th Cir. 2024); see Dkt. No. 12, 13. 23 2. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court order the case transferred to 24 the Eastern District of California and direct the Clerk of Court to transfer the file. 25 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 26 // 27 // 1 DATED: November 18, 2025 Respectfully submitted, 2 CRAIG H. MISSAKIAN United States Attorney 3 /s/ Pamela T. Johann 4 PAMELA T. JOHANN Assistant United States Attorney 5 Attorneys for Respondents 6 7 8 DATED: November 18, 2025 GONDIM LAW CORP.

9 /s/ Marcelo Gondim MARCELO GONDIM 10 Attorneys for Petitioner 11 ECF ATTESTATION 12 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Pamela T. Johann, attest that I have obtained 13 concurrence in the filing of this document from the other signatory listed here. 14

15 /s/ Pamela T. Johann 16 PAMELA T. JOHANN

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Pursuant to stipulation, and in the interest of justice, the Court ORDERS that this matter be 3 || TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. The Clerk of 4 || Court is directed to transfer the file. 5 |} DATED: November 18, 2025

K. LEE 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER RE TRANSFER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

John Doe v. Merrick Garland
109 F.4th 1188 (Ninth Circuit, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joao Alexandres Dos Reis Franco v. Craig Meyer, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joao-alexandres-dos-reis-franco-v-craig-meyer-et-al-cand-2025.