Joannides v. Norris
11 A.2d 139, 337 Pa. 234, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 390
Opinion
This is an appeal from tbe order of the court below granting a new trial in an action of trespass to recover damages for tbe death of plaintiff’s husband. The new trial was granted for tbe sole reason that tbe trial judge felt that be bad not properly instructed tbe jury as to its duty in passing upon the credibility of tbe testimony of a doctor called on behalf of plaintiff. In bis opinion, tbe judge states be thinks justice is best served by a new trial. Tbe trial judge did not abuse bis discretion.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Joannides v. Norris, 11 A.2d 139, 337 Pa. 234, 1940 Pa. LEXIS 390 (Pa. 1940).
11 A.2d 139 (Joannides v. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seidel v. Yeadon Borough
155 A.2d 370 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1959)
MOHR v. Plotkin
142 A.2d 414 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1958)
Joannides, Admrx. v. Norris
23 A.2d 53 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)