Joannide v. Assimacy

216 A.D. 133, 214 N.Y.S. 692, 1926 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9175
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 19, 1926·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

McAvoy, J.

The proposed contract or option to purchase alcohol was unperformed by, defendant. Plaintiffs assert damage. The validity of the option is undisputed. The option expired on a legal holiday. The General Construction Law (§ 25), which extends the time of performance of a condition of a contract until the next business day following a public holiday, is in spirit at least in conformity with the action of plaintiffs in tendering performance of the option on the day following the holiday on which their option would have otherwise expired. While an option is not a strict contract until it is made a mutual obligation by acceptance, yet it is so obviously contractual in its inherent nature as to come within the general term and is governed by section 25 of the General Construction Law.

The judgment appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Dowling and Merrell, JJ., concur; Finch and Martin, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joannide v. Assimacy, 216 A.D. 133, 214 N.Y.S. 692, 1926 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9175 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

216 A.D. 133 (Joannide v. Assimacy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related