Joannide v. Assimacy
This text of 216 A.D. 133 (Joannide v. Assimacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The proposed contract or option to purchase alcohol was unperformed by, defendant. Plaintiffs assert damage. The validity of the option is undisputed. The option expired on a legal holiday. The General Construction Law (§ 25), which extends the time of performance of a condition of a contract until the next business day following a public holiday, is in spirit at least in conformity with the action of plaintiffs in tendering performance of the option on the day following the holiday on which their option would have otherwise expired. While an option is not a strict contract until it is made a mutual obligation by acceptance, yet it is so obviously contractual in its inherent nature as to come within the general term and is governed by section 25 of the General Construction Law.
The judgment appealed from should, therefore, be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.
Dowling and Merrell, JJ., concur; Finch and Martin, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
216 A.D. 133, 214 N.Y.S. 692, 1926 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joannide-v-assimacy-nyappdiv-1926.